Man’s
picture of himself and of the others is of shadowy appearance only.
There are concepts of all styles and techniques, even complete
paintings which are representing, at best, a respectively regional
search but in no way the human in freedom.
Undoubtedly
the human being – and not the subject – will find to himself
only, if he lives in liberal circumstances.
The
meaning of freedom may depend on superficial feelings but is
categorically a question of intelligence and education, both to be
understood as antipodes of egoism and self-assertion. At this level
of self-consciousness only debates on freedom make sense.
Man
is bound to historical facts, to conditions and inherent necessities
which are excluding an absolute freedom in a manner that offers a
“freedom of voting” between different options on precondition
that the search for options is intelligent and responsible. This,
then, is about developing individual choices and not imaginations of
freedom, for example, under religious influence that is – similar
to systems of totalitarianism – talking into believing in freedom
by brainwash and enforcing it even violently.
Humane
cosmonomic freedom requires higher quality than the current
democratic implementations which, although pleasingly libertarian in
comparison with the omnipresent systems of compulsion and the
indoctrinated societies, do not withstand a sound analysis because
they are hollowed by double moral standards and are cheated by
interests of power and capital.
The
contexts of such intrigues are becoming clear only by adequate
background knowledge, by having wide and alert interests which are
the bases of critical faculties and contributing capabilities.
Exactly
those criteria are still concealed by the usual democracies at the
beginning of the 21st century by an unequaled misleading
of the masses.
To
sum up: Human freedom in such circumstances is impossible.
All
the celebrations of “Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité” as victory
of humane values got wild and are used as fuel for globally uncounted
and even secret wars. Warmongers and war profiteers are determining
unalteredly the fate of the globe by improving equipment.
Wherever
this happens in the name of liberal self-adulation the methods are
even more perfidious for the individual fate that doesn’t count.
However,
presidents, chancellors, monarchs and popes may appear embarrassing
but they play the keyboards of stupidity in a virtuous manner:
Desperados of Egomania. Dictators, at least, roar out their hate of
human freedom truly and unambiguously.
Freedom,
in particular, is a brainpower creating nonviolence, freedom from
military pressure, is preventing wars and stabilizing pacifism.
But
pacifism doesn’t mean indecision on destructiveness, quite the
contrary: Lived pacifism is fighting with logic, perspective and
consequence against its opponents. For example, pacifism doesn’t
practice apparently peaceful money-deals with unfree regimes, doesn’t
exercise any diplomatic low trade, avoids weapon-deals and, inter
alia, is creating distance to the less peaceful capitalism and to not
peaceable religions.
Building
up freedom and stabilizing it by force of arms is drawing a fatal
phantom because weapons actually mean captivity of mankind
characterizing the evolutionary interim phase which is marked
essentially by stupidity, a typical state of mind that could be
stopped long since by humane reasons were it not for mightiest powers
against.
Most
people objectively live in miserable living conditions as the world
population is growing and a few privileged people only store their
profits. This is applicable to several groups as well as to the
United Nations. As long as the industrial and progressive societies
which are systematically made dump deliberately conceal that status
freedom will be an option just for dreamers to escape. The mob is
resistant to peace and is kept specially powerless proven even by
activism and idiotic diligence.
In
Germany, for example, they drove methodologically the education
system “on the wall”, they bungled the healthcare system, formed
the media landscape into a sump of mockery of intelligence, they lost
orientation in financial spheres, they juggle with dressed-up
unemployment figure, they are even fighting war which is
circumscribed in belittling manner, they propagate maniac environment
scenarios that even the weather report is characterizing the whole
situation: “Potential of thunderstorm or, simply, climate without
competence!”
The
only system apparently functioning without complication is spying and
observing the citizens.
How
is this possible in one of the most liberal states at all on earth?
Firstly,
Germany is queuing up in the obviously international decadence of
capitalism, secondly, the former “land of poets and thinkers”
holds a special status as a direct result of the unconditioned
capitulation of the Nazi dictatorship.
As
is well known, Germany was divided into two states because of the
controversies among the allied victors and to this very day there is
no peace treaty. The West, at that time, hurried up and founded the
“provisional” Federal Republic of Germany and the East answered
with the “for ever” established GDR. It is historical irony that
the “provisional” solution from the beginning played the better
cards, and, after all, the communist state surrendered and was
integrated into the “provisional” on basis of the Two plus Four
Treaty.
This
particular contract does not substitute a peace treaty and doesn’t
guarantee the German sovereignty whereas the Anglo-American troops
didn’t retreat from their occupation zones.
Furthermore
the reunited Germany has no constitution because the valid
Grundgesetz (Basic Law) is exemplarily and conditionally liberal but
there is no legitimization by the people. The former parliamentary
council (Parlamentarischer Rat), as creator of the Basic Law, was
installed on command from the Western Allies and consisted of 65
identities (plus 5 not voting members of Berlin) and not of elected
representatives of the people. (The federal parliaments were allowed
to agree to the act.)
The
Basic Law is conditionally liberal only because it includes Article
79 (3) which states that the division of the state into different
states (Bundesländer) never ever can be changed. In addition, the
Basic Law is demanding the establishment of a constitution as soon as
Germany is reunited. Up to now there are no indications that the task
will be fulfilled.
At
the latest, since 1945 Germany is not a sovereign and free state even
though it is comparably influential as economic power. This seeming
potential follows from a strict dependence from the USA which grant
to Germany the roll of a vassal.
Let’s
return to the beginning of our thoughts: “Freedom is voting”.
The
German citizens, like the most worldwide, have no options of free
elected alternatives but are just allowed to vote on nuances within
the failing capitalist society draft.
Most
of the people don’t take any notice, they are not to realize.
Whatever the global US-subjects are voting for, Obama and his actual
wire-pullers will not be effected in their strategies of world
determination.
For
long terms such stultified meaning of freedom is converting the being
of men globally into a dump twilight which, at any time, may
violently escalate without any improvements of earlier epochs, and
which is swearing solemnly mankind to live as underdogs for the
arbitrary sacrifice on the battlefield.
Conclusion:
Freedom exists within tactically ordered limits which hardly allow
the founding dimension of human life.
It
is firstly evident that cosmonomic philosophy today must be sensed
mostly as futuristic and even as an ivory tower.
Nevertheless,
the Cosmonomic
Manifesto is indicating a
clarification on the horizon, a mark of hope even for present times
of usual crap, of anxious uncertainty, and of more and more
unnaturally appearing loss of orientation.
(Überarbeitet 2021)
