A
started question of levity, not even the reason of this question will
be evident, if a certain opportune actuality is neglected.
So
what is Germany?
An
apparently secular state? Far-reachingly involved in church and
religion affairs? Although people without religion and church
membership are representing the numerically strongest group?
Do
liberal democratic principles really describe the German fundamental
consciousness or does a more conservative and thoughtless society
follow more or less accurately the state authorities into the
capitalist growth with all its inhumane causes and effects?
Isn't
a further conservative orientation, as the Islamic streams are
propagating it, coming to an opportune moment to join the apparent
ecumenical unity?
So
what is Christianity in view of the countless splittings and
different interpretations of the Bible?
And
what is the Islam, tearing each other by interpretations of the
Coran?
Where
to are Islamic social orders leading? One may look at the states
which are dominated by them!
After
all some approaches of enlightenment were made possible by the
softening of Christian stances which originally weren't of less
cruelty. Of course, this enlightenment meanwhile is financed away by
presentable agreements of the insatiable capitalism.
The
question „Does the Islam Belong to Germany?“ seems to be quite
ridiculous because the various Islamic manners are there in Germany,
recently more often, but what is the meaning of „recently“? Once
again, what is Germany at present, what was it earlier, how
historically of short breath and changing?
The
purpose is to create an enlightened liberal democratic humane
European space for living in the future.
In
trying this all religions have failed and they are on the point of
even more afflicting derailment by the multiple use of new
technologies.
Religious
liberty is „freedom of option“, who would call it in question as
it is existing.
The
factual and inevitably amounting confrontations of religions are
marking a typical temper of all those who feel chosen and are leading
to disturbances of the public peace preventing further and higher
humane development of zivilisation.
Being
misinterpreted as „humane progress“ freedom of religion is
implementing the paradox of religion and democracy into the public
which means an absolute impossibility because of the exclusivity
against each other. In other words: A wrong track to the future, even
codified in constitutions. Simply because of their sometimes
venerable ages these liberty manifestations, again and again praised
as democratic examples, need a consequently secular revision.
The
secular enlightened state doesn't follow any religious instructions
like officially, for example, astrology doesn't possess any meaning.
No
private religious view has the right for missioniring the public,
even more it is the duty to integrate oneself in a secular and
liberal-peaceful manner, or the logical consequence is possible, in
case of religious stubbornness, to look for an adequate habitat out
of enlightenment.
Increasing
religious immigration, in Germany as in all other countries, is
meaning sociopolitical step back by growing irrational conflicts and
thus causing the weakening of secular achievments.
