An
“alian” who is not so acquainted with our small-earthly
circumstances sent in the following question:
There
have appeared thousands of Raymond Walden's aphorisms, many essays,
poems, commentaries and, not at last, the Cosmonomic Manifesto in the
Internet for meanwhile almost twelve years. Why are they never
published in the public media?
Here
is the answer:
We
have a “free” press which, in ideological loyalty, is choosing
“freely” what is presented, prevaricated, kept secret and
ignored. The press sincerely is afraid of the cosmonomic
understanding of freedom because of the critical questioning of the
worldwide role as opinion makers, as dictators causing stultification
and finally incapacitation by serving ideologies and dogmas of the
ruling classes.
The
Cosmonomic Manifesto for example is unique by all its demands for
liberal democracy, for humane individualism, for emancipation, for
enlightenment, education, social security, healthcare, for protection
of mankind and nature, for peace and disarmament, for non-violence,
for freedom of mind and speech and so on. Thus, by direct comparison
of the social circumstances in each case, blatant errors can't be
hidden or palliated.
What
is more: The Cosmonomic Manifesto is becoming an accusation against
all those politicians and relevant circles who, with an audacious
self-evidence, burn out human lives, be it by direct killing and
violation or by strategic warmongering, within aggressive alliances
and even by weapon-technical supplies for own benefits.
However,
cosmonomic philosophy will never stab into its own back and call for
violent disputes!
The
ideologists and dogmatists, like their medial adjutants, have to fear
just the weapons of the clear word within a democratic culture of
discussion with the objectives of deescalation and peaceful
compromises.
And
obviously they do fear them, as it is proven by their permanent
suppression of the cosmonomic body of thought.
And
also this, again and again explained, clarification:
Cosmonomy
is not a prevailing theory, not an indoctrination but an offer for
thinking which you may follow exclusively by your own will, without
any compulsion but with philanthropic and respectful consequences.
