We Have A "Free" Press

An “alian” who is not so acquainted with our small-earthly circumstances sent in the following question:

There have appeared thousands of Raymond Walden's aphorisms, many essays, poems, commentaries and, not at last, the Cosmonomic Manifesto in the Internet for meanwhile almost twelve years. Why are they never published in the public media?

Here is the answer:

We have a “free” press which, in ideological loyalty, is choosing “freely” what is presented, prevaricated, kept secret and ignored. The press sincerely is afraid of the cosmonomic understanding of freedom because of the critical questioning of the worldwide role as opinion makers, as dictators causing stultification and finally incapacitation by serving ideologies and dogmas of the ruling classes.

The Cosmonomic Manifesto for example is unique by all its demands for liberal democracy, for humane individualism, for emancipation, for enlightenment, education, social security, healthcare, for protection of mankind and nature, for peace and disarmament, for non-violence, for freedom of mind and speech and so on. Thus, by direct comparison of the social circumstances in each case, blatant errors can't be hidden or palliated.

What is more: The Cosmonomic Manifesto is becoming an accusation against all those politicians and relevant circles who, with an audacious self-evidence, burn out human lives, be it by direct killing and violation or by strategic warmongering, within aggressive alliances and even by weapon-technical supplies for own benefits.

However, cosmonomic philosophy will never stab into its own back and call for violent disputes!

The ideologists and dogmatists, like their medial adjutants, have to fear just the weapons of the clear word within a democratic culture of discussion with the objectives of deescalation and peaceful compromises.

And obviously they do fear them, as it is proven by their permanent suppression of the cosmonomic body of thought.

And also this, again and again explained, clarification:

Cosmonomy is not a prevailing theory, not an indoctrination but an offer for thinking which you may follow exclusively by your own will, without any compulsion but with philanthropic and respectful consequences.